Get the ChemPriceHub app — track prices on the go. Membership syncs across app & web. View plans
 
Home > News > [Organic Chemicals] Understanding the MMA (methyl methacrylate) value chain in o...

[Organic Chemicals] Understanding the MMA (methyl methacrylate) value chain in one go

James Morrison
Published on 2026-10-10

[Organic Chemicals] Understanding the MMA (methyl methacrylate) value chain in one go

This is the fourth piece in a series on value chain analysis. The others are "Understanding the PVC value chain in one go," "Understanding the propylene value chain in one go," and "Understanding the styrene value chain in one go" — feel free to click through if you're interested.

I think value analysis is an important method for market analysis. It lets you quickly grasp the logic of how value is transmitted through an industrial chain, and from that transmission logic you can predict the direction of cost pass-through, which in turn helps you forecast where commodity prices are headed. Studying costs is a big part of that value chain work.

I'll keep doing value analysis on chemical industry chains, and I hope this kind of analysis helps the industry run in a healthier way and makes value distribution more reasonable.

MMA stands for methyl methacrylate. It's an important raw material for making polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), which is what we commonly call acrylic. MMA gets a lot of industry attention because of the high-performance material properties of the downstream PMMA.

I've noticed that with the rapid growth of China's new materials industry, new materials used downstream in optics, electronics, and automotive have drawn much more attention, and they've really taken off in recent years. PMMA's properties in optical applications in particular have pushed its profile up a lot. PMMA can be used in LCD materials, automotive instrument and lighting materials, building decoration materials, advertising light box materials, and so on.

You could also say it's the growth of the PMMA industry that's pulling the MMA chain forward. According to what I've found, there are currently three mainstream MMA production processes: the acetone cyanohydrin route (ACH), the ethylene carbonylation route, and the isobutylene oxidation route (C4). Among Chinese producers right now, ACH and C4 dominate, and there's no commercial-scale plant using ethylene carbonylation.

ACH was the earliest industrialized MMA process. It uses hydrogen cyanide — a byproduct of acrylonitrile production — as a raw material. With an alkaline catalyst (diethylamine), acetone cyanohydrin forms. That reacts with sulfuric acid to produce methacrylamide sulfate, which after hydrolysis undergoes esterification with methanol to give crude MMA plus an acidic water-containing mixture. The crude MMA is distilled to get the MMA product, unreacted methanol is recovered and recycled, and the residual liquid goes to a recovery stage to reclaim ammonium bisulfate. In other words, ACH uses acetone and hydrogen cyanide as its raw materials.

The isobutylene route, or C4 route, first oxidizes isobutylene to methacrolein, then oxidizes that to methacrylic acid, and finally esterifies with methanol to make MMA.

Domestic C4 routes are all three-step processes. First, isobutylene/tert-butanol undergoes gas-phase oxidation with air over a Mo-Bi catalyst to form MA; isobutylene conversion exceeds 95%, and MA selectivity (mole fraction) is above 80%. Second, MA is oxidized to MAA using a phosphomolybdenum catalyst with alkali metals added to improve thermal stability, adjust activity, and increase surface area; through multi-stage oxidation, MA conversion can reach 98%. Third, MAA is esterified to MMA — the esterification can be either a liquid-phase or gas-phase reaction.

Comments

0
  • Elena Vasquez 2026-10-10 13:36
    Which MMA (methyl methacrylate) production process is more competitive? I've seen that different production processes lead to big cost gaps for the same chemical, which creates different competitive landscapes. The Chinese MMA market now has nearly six production processes, and all six have been industrialized. In the Chinese market, the competitive situation varies widely from one process to another. According to what I've found, the mainstream MMA processes are acetone cyanohydrin (ACH), ethylene carbonylation, and isobutylene oxidation (C4). Building on these three, there are also an improved ACH process, a glacial acetic acid process, and processes named after the companies behind them — BASF and Lucite. All six have commercial plants of 10,000 tons/year or more running in China. One thing worth pointing out: in September 2022, a 10,000-ton-scale coal-based methanol-to-acetic-acid-to-MMA industrial demonstration unit independently developed by the Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, started up successfully and ran steadily, with product meeting spec. This was the world's first coal-based methanol-acetic acid MMA demonstration plant, shifting domestic MMA production from relying entirely on petroleum feedstock to using coal-based feedstock. I've written before about the MMA value chain — "Understanding the MMA (methyl methacrylate) value chain in one go" — feel free to click through if you're interested. I've observed that the shift in the competitive landscape has also changed the supply-demand environment for MMA, which has held prices back from running strong. Looking at the past two years of price movement, China's MMA market price has fluctuated in a narrow range, with a high of 14,014 yuan/ton and a low of about 10,000 yuan/ton. As of August 2023, China's MMA market price was 11,500 yuan/ton. The main downstream product for MMA is PMMA, and most companies develop around the MMA-PMMA chain model. PMMA's market price has been weak and rangebound over the past two years, with a high of 17,560 yuan/ton and a low of 14,625 yuan/ton. As of August 2023, mainstream PMMA prices in China were fluctuating around 14,600 yuan/ton. Note that since domestic PMMA products are mostly mid-to-low-end grades, their price level is lower than the import market. It's now widely accepted in the industry that different MMA production processes determine the competitiveness of the MMA-PMMA chain. I estimated MMA costs under different processes, past and present, and reached the following conclusions: First, setting aside acetic acid route MMA plants, the ethylene route has been the most competitive MMA process over the past two years. According to my data, comparing MMA production costs across different processes in China from 2020 to August 2023, the ethylene route had the lowest cost and the strongest competitiveness. In 2020, the theoretical cost for ethylene-route MMA was 5,530 yuan/ton, and the average cost for January-July 2023 was only 6,088 yuan/ton.
No comments yet.