Get the ChemPriceHub app — track prices on the go. Membership syncs across app & web. View plans
 
Home > News > [Basic Chemicals] The chemical industry may be entering a 'five-year big cycle' ...

[Basic Chemicals] The chemical industry may be entering a 'five-year big cycle' — what does this mean for companies and the market?

Marcus Hayes
Published on 2026-11-13

[Basic Chemicals] The chemical industry may be entering a 'five-year big cycle' — what does this mean for companies and the market?

  1. Heavy-asset nature means inherently strong cycles and lagging supply. Chemical projects involve huge investment, and construction typically takes 2–3 years. When demand picks up, new capacity can't come online right away, so prices rise fast; when demand falls, built capacity is hard to shut down and exit quickly, so prices stay under pressure. This supply rigidity is what makes the chemical industry so strongly cyclical.

  2. Resource endowment determines a company's long-term survival. Upstream raw materials (oil, coal, phosphate rock, potash, etc.) differ by natural resource. Companies sitting on low-cost resources are on the left side of the cost curve. They weather downturns better and have the biggest profit elasticity in upcycles — resource barriers are the deepest moat in chemicals.

Second, a full breakdown of the value chain: how value flows through upstream, midstream, and downstream. The complete chemical chain runs resources → basic feedstock → chemical products → end applications, with value amplifying at each step.

Upstream | Resource extraction and basic feedstock. Energy resources: oil, natural gas, coal. Mineral resources: phosphate rock, potash, titanium ore, sulfur, fluorite. Core logic: supply rigidity + resource barriers. Upstream is the source of the chain and usually starts raising prices first when the cycle turns — the earliest beneficiary of an upcycle.

Midstream | Basic chemicals (the value-creation hub). Refining integration, coal-to-olefins, soda ash, chlor-alkali, titanium dioxide, MDI/TDI, silicones, refrigerants, and other bulk chemicals. Core logic: economies of scale + technology iteration. Competition is fiercest here and the landscape keeps diverging; product price elasticity is high, making it the main battleground of cyclical rallies.

Downstream | Fine chemicals + end applications. Fine chemicals: electronic chemicals, pharmaceutical intermediates, pesticides, specialty additives. Downstream demand: chemical fiber and textiles, automotive rubber and plastics, architectural coatings, new energy materials, semiconductors, agricultural fertilizer. Core logic: demand-driven + import substitution. Downstream carries the growth from emerging industries, and new materials and high-end fine chemicals have stronger growth characteristics.

The order in which cyclical price hikes pass through: upstream resources → midstream intermediate feedstock → downstream end chemicals. In this upcycle, the price transmission chain is gradually playing out.

Third, cycle positioning: chemicals are already at the start of a new upcycle. Based on research from multiple institutions, the chemical sector is seeing a double-bottom resonance of the capacity cycle and the inventory cycle, plus policy support, and a new upcycle has officially begun.

  1. Capacity cycle: industry expansion is near its end and the supply inflection point is confirmed. The downturn that began in the second half of 2022 lasted until the end of 2025 — nearly three and a half years, the longest downturn on record. Industry capex is turning negative: fixed investment in petrochemicals and chemicals fell sharply in 2024–2025; in Q1 2026, basic chemicals capex was down 12.2% year on year. The 'construction in progress / fixed assets' ratio has fallen back below 20%, close to a historic low; willingness to expand is extremely weak. Capacity coming online in 2026 is basically all from stock projects approved before 2025, so new supply pressure is limited.

  2. Inventory cycle: destocking has been thorough, and a restocking rally is building.

Comments

0
  • Daniel Foster 2026-11-13 13:55
    Friends know the chemical industry isn't a linear-growth business — it's a cyclical one driven by supply and demand, profit margins, investment, and capacity. The traditional logic: demand growth pushes prices up, better profits encourage capex, companies' new project investments come online together as capacity, capacity surges and supply outpaces demand, prices fall and profits come under pressure, companies cut or halt production voluntarily or otherwise, or backward capacity gets merged or exits, and supply rebalances. That's the chemical cycle law people often talk about. The National Bureau of Statistics publishes capacity utilization by industry every quarter, and the figure for raw chemical materials and chemical products shows this cycle law very clearly. In Q1 2020, hit by the pandemic, chemical capacity utilization fell to 69.5%, recovered to 74.2% in Q2 and 77.2% in Q4. In 2021, as the pandemic stabilized and factories resumed work, Q1 utilization was 76.9%, rising to a stage high of 80.0% in Q2, then 77.8% in Q3 and 77.6% in Q4. With utilization and margins soaring, talk of a chemical boom was everywhere, and a wave of new capacity followed. In 2022: 77.7% in Q2, 75.3% in Q3, 76.0% in Q4, averaging 76.7% for the year. The boom people hoped for was short-lived and quickly turned into an adjustment period. The 2023 average was 75.3%; 2024 was a plateau, with quarters at 76.4%, 76.4%, 76.0%, and 76.4%, averaging 76.3%. 2025 weakened noticeably: 73.5% in Q1, 71.9% in Q2, 72.5% in Q3, 74.1% in Q4, only 73.0% for the year. Also starting in 2023, new projects invested in the previous two years began coming online in batches, even more concentrated in 2024 and 2025, and anti-involution policy followed. 2026 keeps weakening: 73.8% in Q1 and just 69.4% in Q2, almost on par with the first pandemic quarter. These numbers aren't just about production load — they mean China's chemical industry has formally moved from an era of capacity expansion into a stock-competition era decided by cost, efficiency, technology, cash flow, and supply-chain capability. To put it bluntly, if imprecisely: new capacity will still be added, and stock competition can become a fight to the death — companies won't be asking how much profit they make but whether they survive. First, the 2021 boom was a cycle peak driven by a special supply-demand mismatch. The 2021 boom mainly came from force majeure causing uneven global supply-demand recovery, which led to temporary shortages of key raw materials. When China stabilized the pandemic and resumed work, most overseas regions were still dealing with shutdown plants, port congestion, and poor logistics. On top of that, stimulus policies drove a rapid rebound in domestic consumption and manufacturing demand, and companies quickly shifted from destocking to concentrated restocking.
No comments yet.