Get the ChemPriceHub app — track prices on the go. Membership syncs across app & web. View plans
 
Home > News > [Fine Chemicals] He made hyaluronic acid drop from 1 million to cabbage price, b...

[Fine Chemicals] He made hyaluronic acid drop from 1 million to cabbage price, but in the end couldn't grasp the industry's lifeline

James Morrison
Published on 2026-11-04

[Fine Chemicals] He made hyaluronic acid drop from 1 million to cabbage price, but in the end couldn't grasp the industry's lifeline

At noon today, Bloomage Biotech posted an obituary: Guo Xueping, 61, passed away after treatment for illness failed. Most people probably haven't heard this name, but you've definitely used a hydrating spray, or gotten a water-light injection, or worn a hyaluronic acid mask. If you trace it back further, to that old lab extracting hyaluronic acid from rooster combs, his name would be on the wall. You could say that without him and his team, there'd be no hyaluronic acid as we know it today. This actually ties closely to all our lives, so today let's talk about him and his hyaluronic acid brand.

Before 1990, China's pharmaceutical-grade hyaluronic acid was entirely imported. The highest-purity raw material once cost as much as 1 million RMB per kilogram—not 100 RMB, but 1 million. Around the same time, international market quotes were about $200,000 per kilogram. Calling it 'liquid gold' is no exaggeration. How primitive was the extraction? Ling Peixue and his team tried several generations of cow eyes, pig eyes, and rooster combs, finally settling on rooster combs. One kilogram of hyaluronic acid required tens of thousands of rooster combs. What Guo Xueping did was turn this from lab handcraft into industrial production. The report states he 'pioneered microbial fermentation production technology for hyaluronic acid in China and achieved large-scale production, and pioneered large-scale production technology for precise control of the full spectrum of molecular weights of hyaluronic acid.' In plain terms: first, make hyaluronic acid fermentable in batches, no longer extracted from rooster combs; second, cut the same batch of raw material into various molecular weights—for skincare, injections, eye care, and ingestion, each with its own grade. Fermentation cut production costs by 90%. According to Guo Xueping's public introduction in 2022, the company's annual hyaluronic acid output grew from a few hundred jin in early years to over 400 tons, an increase of more than 1,000 times. With the three cards of technology, quality, and cost, his team brought China's high-end pharmaceutical-grade and cosmetic-grade hyaluronic acid to official and pharmaceutical company recognition in the US, EU, Japan, and South Korea. The reason Bloomage Biotech could sit at the top of global hyaluronic acid raw materials is that he laid the foundation. And Ling Peixue—now founder of the Dr. Ling brand—was the technical source taking hyaluronic acid from 0 to 1, while Guo Xueping was the industrialization driver from 1 to 100. Both are very important.

When you mention hyaluronic acid, you have to mention Freda, Bloomage Biotech, and even Dr. Ling—these companies.

First, one thing must be clear: they all originated from the same company.

Back to 1983, starting from an old factory building, to two listed companies.

In 1983, Ling Peixue was a master's student, and his advisor Zhang Tianming gave him the direction of extracting hyaluronic acid from rooster combs.

This graduation thesis was later described by Zhang Tianming as 'writing out a 3-billion industry.'

In 1986, Ling Peixue graduated and joined the Shandong Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences, starting hyaluronic acid industrialization research in an old factory with 30,000 RMB in startup funds.

In '92, the team pioneered industrial production of hyaluronic acid via biological fermentation in China.

In '93, Ling Peixue led the establishment of Shandong Biochemical Pharmaceutical Company, the predecessor of Freda Group.

Comments

0
  • Olivier Dupont 2026-11-04 13:45
    China, with its advanced industrial preparation capacity and low-cost advantages in hyaluronic acid, has become the main global exporter of hyaluronic acid raw materials. Based on calculations (summing market shares of sample companies in China), China's hyaluronic acid share reached 73% in 2018 and rose 3 percentage points to 76% in 2021. Among them, Bloomage Biotech's market share has continued to increase, from 36% globally in 2018 to 44%. The company has a stronger edge in pharmaceutical-grade hyaluronic acid and is one of the few globally to obtain pharmaceutical-grade product qualifications in China, Europe, and North America. Below we break down the company's core competitiveness in hyaluronic acid raw materials from three dimensions: technology, production capacity, and qualifications. Technology: leveraging two major technological advantages—microbial fermentation and biological enzyme cutting—to establish production efficiency and product quality. Microbial fermentation: Currently, the industry's main process for producing hyaluronic acid raw materials is microbial fermentation, using the natural property of strains to metabolize and produce hyaluronic acid, through wild strain mutagenesis and high-throughput screening to achieve large-scale fermentation production. The company's fermentation yield reaches 12-14 g/L, while the industry average is 6-7 g/L, higher than the industry level. Biological enzyme cutting: Molecular weight is an important parameter of hyaluronic acid. High molecular weight hyaluronic acid (e.g., over 2,000 kDa) is suitable for medical products like ophthalmic viscoelastic agents, while oligo-hyaluronic acid (molecular weight below 10 kDa) has high absorption characteristics and easily penetrates the dermis. It promotes damage repair and provides cell protection. Generally, commercial hyaluronic acid raw material products have molecular weights between 500 kDa and 2,000 kDa; producing ultra-high, low, and oligo molecular weights beyond this range is difficult. Through comprehensive enzyme cutting and separation/purification technology, the company achieved industrial breakthroughs in different molecular weights, with raw material molecular weight ranging from 2 kDa to ultra-large 4,000 kDa. The company has a strong leading advantage in large-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid. By mutagenesis screening, the company obtained high-quality strains capable of producing high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid, and using segmented temperature-controlled fermentation and purification technology, achieved industrial production of hyaluronic acid up to 4,000 kDa. Terminal sterilization technology: The company was the first in China to adopt terminal sterilization technology for hyaluronic acid injections, replacing aseptic filling for similar products, achieving a technological breakthrough. This technology raised the sterility assurance level from one in a thousand to one in a million, significantly improving product safety. The company thoroughly solved the technical challenge of terminal moist heat sterilization for such products through technological innovation, and was cited by the CFDA as the standard sterilization method for these products. Through process control, key quality parameters such as nucleic acids and endotoxins are 1/50 and 1/20 of the limits set by the European Pharmacopoeia international standards, reaching international leading levels. High R&D spending drives the company to the forefront of technological innovation. In H1 2022, the company's R&D expense ratio was 6.11%. Compared with peer chemical raw material companies, this 6% is relatively high, and the R&D spending amount is above the industry level, demonstrating the company's important determination to invest in technological R&D.
No comments yet.